Internal handling of assault cases in Errenteria questioned over lack of legal guarantees

Experts warn that resolving sexual assault cases outside the courts lacks legal validity and leaves victims unprotected.

Gavel on legal documents representing judicial processes.
IA

Gavel on legal documents representing judicial processes.

The internal management of sexual assault and sexist complaints in Errenteria has sparked controversy as cases were handled privately without legal oversight.

Cases linked to the Xenpelar Bertso Eskola and the dance company Kukai have highlighted concerns over how local entities address alleged crimes. In both instances, private agreements were preferred over judicial proceedings, leading to broken commitments and leaving victims without the necessary legal protections.
Legal experts emphasize that these processes do not qualify as restorative justice, which must be mandated by a court. Representatives from the Clara Campoamor association argue that mediation is inappropriate for sexual assault cases, as victims typically seek formal justice for the harm suffered.
The mayor of Errenteria has testified before the Juvenile Prosecutor's Office to verify information sent to the Judicial Police. Meanwhile, political groups have criticized the lack of institutional transparency, demanding a firm response that ensures legal guarantees rather than relying on private settlements.