The second and final session of the trial concerning the Berango case has begun with the testimony of a witness proposed by the defense, followed by the defendants' statements. Although most chose not to testify, some have denied the accusations. As reported by media outlets, Hegoi Uriarte stated that the event on March 13, 2022, had no connection to the glorification of terrorism. Sendoa Aratz Jurado, on the other hand, denied speaking at the welcome event but recalled that those present were exercising their civil and political rights.
The prosecution has based its case on Article 578.1 of the Penal Code, requesting a two-year prison sentence for the 16 defendants. Furthermore, it has argued the possibility of "reoffending" in some cases, mentioning the option to seek harsher penalties, although without providing specifics. Dignidad y Justicia, Vox, and the Villacisneros Foundation have also acted as accusers in the proceedings.
A key point of contention in the trial has been the role of an alleged "collaborator" mentioned in Civil Guard reports. According to the prosecution, this secret informant recorded the speeches at the event. The defense, however, has questioned the existence of these recordings and, if they exist, has requested clarification on how they were legally obtained. The prosecution has explained that the recordings or media were kept to protect the source of information.
The defense has requested the acquittal of the defendants, framing the event within the scope of freedom of expression, the right to opinion, and political participation. The court must now decide whether to accept the prosecution's thesis or, as the defense argues, whether the actions of the accused fall within the exercise of civil and political rights.
