The Alavese countryside, traditionally associated with potatoes and cereals, has begun to explore new alternatives to diversify its crops. A study by the Neiker technology center now positions the onion as a viable option that could also open a new path for irrigation in Álava and help comply with the crop rotations required by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP).
Trials conducted by Neiker in the Alavese town of Gauna have shown that several onion varieties respond well in the soil. A Neiker researcher emphasizes that the onion is “a very interesting alternative, complementary to the potato,” and adds a practical advantage: “it has a similarity and mechanization that can be similar to that of the potato.” Crop rotation is one of the great benefits of this initiative, as it is essential to keep the soil healthy and alive.
“"The difficult part of producing is the subsequent commercialization after production."
The Alavese Agrarian and Livestock Union (UAGA) is following the proposal with interest, but with “their feet on the ground.” A member of its executive committee explains that the idea arose because “the beet sector and irrigation sectors are in decline,” which led to the search for “alternative crops.” The onion was identified as one that “could fit into our territory.”
Despite the interest, the main uncertainty is the commercial outlet for the product. The UAGA member confirms that there are “farmers willing to try,” but warns of the risk of “venturing into a new crop without knowing if you will be able to sell it.” The sector fears that, without a guaranteed market, farmers will bear the entire investment and “then the product will be left at home.”
“"It cannot be a path to be traveled only by the primary sector."
The key, according to the UAGA member, is that “it cannot be a path to be traveled only by the primary sector.” Unlike cereals or potatoes, which are marketed through cooperatives, direct sales of large volumes of onions are not viable. Therefore, they insist on the need for “an industry associated with these new productions” so that the initiative does not fail and farmers do not have to “throw away all the product and all the expenses of a year.”
